By Reverend Lainie Dowell
Fiat Justilia, rual coelum
Translation: "Let justice be done, though the heavens fall."
Politicians, news pundits, lawyers, and citizens are now engaged in vain disputations about what has become known across the nation as the ObamaCare Health law only because of the unlawful actions taken, in turn, by the United States Congress (Legislative Branch), the Obama Administration (Executive Branch), and the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Roberts (Judicial Branch).
Despite evidence which points to tyranny and betrayal from every area of government and life throughout America, citizens look on with wonder and appear helpless to do anything but watch the continued weakening of the United States Constitution spurred on by the man at the helm of this capitalist government who presents as a stranger in the White House by the name of Barack Hussein Obama.
Obama has managed to introduce into the national dialogue his own misguided notion that he is untouchable, beautiful, and above the Constitution, the rule of law, and even our God. He has convinced himself, his "partnerships," and so many elected officials and even our military that since he is President of these United States of America and the Commander in Chief of the Military, that he is entitled to arbitrarily and "fundamentally transform" America into his image with impunity and without accountability. Furthermore, anybody who challenges Obama more than likely will be labelled as racists, because he used his color, black, as a weapon, to subject any who oppose him to be ridiculed and bombarded with lies about them from Obama and his supporters. And it makes no difference to them what position their "targets" hold.
For decades, Obama and his wife, Michelle, have deliberately, knowingly, and willfully, perpetrated a fraud on the court and the American citizens. In addition, they have both brazenly committed perjury by misrepresenting as truth on official documents they have filed, information they knew to be false, in order to enable both Obamas to campaign for public offices, which have led to his campaign, nomination, inauguration and first term in the Office of President. What's more, they have made no secret of the fact that they have continued to conspire with this nation's enemies, foreign and domestic, in order to totally destroy America, and Israel, too.
They have both consorted with many anti-American factions to form their own grassroots coalitions and partnerships in an attempt to set up their own little government inside of this Republic and to enable them to accumulate enough money in their coffers to further tear down every one of our freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence and to cannibalize and socialize a generational future never imagined on these shores.
Presenting A Case of First Impression Lodged Directly Against the Roberts Supreme Court of the United States of America
Early in the morning of Monday, July 2, 2012, I had already begun tweeting messages about the recent Roberts Court decision, with a call for it to be challenged, stating as follows:
http://twitter.com/clergywomen/statuses/219715620785242113
http://twitter.com/clergywomen/statuses/219713055209168896
http://twitter.com/clergywomen/statuses/219714551678111744
#ROBERT'S COURT RULING HAS 2B CHALLENGED LIKE NONE OTHER B/C BASED ON #CONSTITUTION IT'S IN ERROR. CHECK IT.-me
Our entire legal system is broken and all systems of this government have aided and abetted the weakening of the foundation set in place by our forefathers to hold the Constitution "in perpetuity." However, the legal community has cowardly allowed Americans to limp along on erroneous unconstitutional legal grounds for so long they managed to even convince citizens that all was right in the land when, in fact, nothing could have been any more wrong. However, the June 28, 2012, shocker of the decision from the Roberts Court regarding the Obama Administration Health Care mandated law, has caused a lot of people to sit up and take notice.
Even so, many in Congress, the legal professions, and the news media remain of the opinion that we are stuck with that decision and every other improper ruling made by the court. I, along with so many others, disagree. And, it is time for the country to stop being run by corrupt lawyers, judges, and anti-American, anti-Constitutional elected and unelected foes. America is not for sale to the highest bidder and neither are citizens. We are not chattel, property, or what Michelle Obama calls, "ASSETS" to forever manipulate and maneuver, at their every whim; and, God and our Constitution be damned.
Case in point
Obama and his team created a straw man argument in re "tax" vs "penalty" in order to deflect questioners from the relevant material point that he has presented no valid Constitutional evidence that he has the authority to even be in the Office of the President of the United States of America. Despite the recent legal shenanigans, Republicans and news pundits still fail to see the wider picture that reveals how Obama's Alinsky "Rules," he used and taught to others as a community organizer, have gotten him what he has wanted in spite of the underhanded way it came about. Chief Justice Roberts recently overstepped his judiciary limitations when he brushed the USA Constitution aside and rewrote the (already) unconstitutional healthcare Obama law which was pending on appeal before the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). Yet Republicans and news media accept that is the way it is and must remain until and unless another event piles on to it.
Now is the time to step up and reject such ongoing repugnancy to this nation's rule of law and strong standing in the world.
Once SCOTUS had made a valid finding that the government (Obama Administration) did not prove its case under its own presentation and legal arguments (i.e., their stated "penalty" under the commerce law), Chief Justice Roberts became obligated at that point to have declared that issue to be null and void, because it did not meet the Constitutional standard under the government's own briefed and stated argument. On the contrary, instead of Chief Justice Roberts ruling in accordance with the Supreme Law of the land, he also proceeded to circumvent the USA Congress and he also usurped the Constitutional authority of the legislative branch. And, thereby, Chief Roberts, himself, illegally and unconstitutionally legislated from the bench in violation of the enumerated powers of the Constitution without regard for the limited powers thereto.
Moreover, Roberts was not legally authorized, thereafter, to remand that case to "we the people," for their determination about the issue at a later date, presumably during the November 2012 Presidential Election.
But for that unauthorized unconstitutional occurrence instigated by SCOTUS, there would be no need to continue this needless confusion and ambivalence about whether or not the Obama Health Care mandate and their "penalty" was created in violation of the constitution. And that is the issue which should have stopped the government's case in its tracks from becoming the unconstitutional law of the land. Then, SCOTUS could have legally allowed the appropriate course of action to return the issue to the legislative branch for an orderly debate and further action upon it. Remember, too, that not one Republican in either the House of Representatives or in the Senate voted to enact that huge bill into law before it made its way to become law after Obama signed it and on to SCOTUS, following objections to it by the American people.
Congress is the only legislative body given that authority by the Constitution, as the representatives of we the people. Yet, the Obama Administration, along with the Democrat Party in the House of Representatives and in the Senate, now as the Progressive Party, had maintained during the legislative process that they were not passing "a (lawful) tax," but that it was "a (commerce) penalty" against all citizens who would not comply with the government healthcare mandate to require all citizens to buy health insurance or else face penalties imposed by a newer bulked up IRS.
At the same time, the Obama Administration began authorizing waivers to friends, family, and neighbors they deemed to be worthy of escape from that monster. That administration also began to enact regulations, policies, and procedures and increase costs on a law that was not set to go into effect until after 2013 and closer to 2016.
However, once the government entered into the Supreme Court appeals process and realized their "penalty" would not pass Constitutional muster with the court, they switched to another tactic and asked the court to reconsider their "penalty" as being "a tax," instead. In affect, what that governmental request did was to once again act to circumvent the Congress and ask the court to rule on that legislative issue by fiat from the bench. And, as it turned out, that is just what Chief Justice Roberts did following a public scolding by Barack Obama from the White House Rose Garden and by Senator Patrick Leahy, speaking against SCOTUS from the Senate floor. It was rightly perceived as a means to intimidate and warn SCOTUS to vote in the government's favor -- or else what?!
Was that the case? What is it about the strange relationship between Obama and Chief Justice Roberts that makes Obama feel confident enough to publicly berate the SCOTUS (and to do so privately, as when Roberts went to the White House in January 2009 after the inauguration and quietly gave Obama a second oath of office)?
Historically, the founding fathers wrote the Constitution in such a way that it would stand in perpetuity. And, so it has. Nevertheless, over time, many administrations since have weakened that foundation. However, none has done so as blatantly as the Obama Administration. So we find ourselves in another Constitutional crisis mode in which the court, itself, has publicly and tragically veered from the Constitution for purely political reasons instead of acting within the lawful limitations of the purview of the United States Constitution, settled as the Supreme Law of the Land.
A CASE OF FIRST IMPRESSION EVOLVES AGAINST SCOTUS
It appears the circumstances were created by SCOTUS, itself, which worked to trigger a case of first impression against them. To say nothing of the fact that Obama's appointed Justice Elena Kagan who was now sitting on that court had refused to recuse herself from the deliberations and ruling in that case, which she did with the blessings of Chief Justice Roberts. But, as a lawyer, she had hands on participation in creating that Obama health care mandate issue which was now pending before the court.In addition to the Constitutional foundations, individual citizens have the guaranteed right to petition the government for redress via the Declaration of Independence. And, that is among other rights so delineated therein, to remain intact no matter how many various and sundry courts may have watered down those rights. The Constitution gives no person or organization arbitrary authority to do anything that is clearly outside the limitations contained within that founding document, the Constitution and its enumerated powers and limitations, thereto.
A CITIZEN'S PETITION FOR CONGRESSIONAL REDRESS
To my good faith knowledge, information, and belief, there has not been a challenge made directly to any of the past Supreme Court rulings once SCOTUS had read and filed the case as law. But it is clear to me this is one such case which clearly exacerbates those already unconstitutional actions previously taken by the Obama Administration to have created such a law violative of the United States Constitution in the first place. And, as citizens, we need not be burdened by it or stand aside and watch lawyers line their pockets with taxpayer dollars as they litigate their cases knowing the outcome from the beginning.
Researched historical documents present proof of a prima facie case to nullify the Roberts Court’s June 28, 2012 decision. One such case states, in part,
"It is the power of the courts to declare null and void an act of the Congress repugnant to the Constitution, which chiefly distinguishes this government from all other governments, and is the greatest safeguard to its endurance. It is this power in the courts that always has, and always will, secure the equal rights of citizens."
Americans stand in need of the restoration of trust in American jurisprudence as it adversely touches on every area of our lives throughout this nation. And, if this present SCOTUS error is allowed to stand without further consideration to review and make it right and constitutional, then the American people possibly may be forced to resort to anarchy. They will reject all of these unconstitutional Obama fiats in the near term. They have resolved to be law-abiding citizens but, at the same time they have become more resolved to never relinquish their right to enjoy the fruits of Godly freedom, the Constitution, and the rule of law that come with our being American citizens by and through the foundational documents forged by our forefathers on our behalf and deemed by them to be the case for generations to come "By Divine Providence."
Further source(s):
Merriam-Webster Dictionary
http://www.m-w.org
The United States Constitution
The Declaration of Independence
The American Law Review (1866-1906) July/Aug 1906, 40. American Periodicals, pg. 566. By Blackburn Esterline, Chicago 1906.
No comments:
Post a Comment