A Trotskyite Socialist
Photo: National Journal
A Hired Obama Propagandist
There are too many peas in America's pod, and this ongoing new (old) change of political, elected leadership is not a game. However, if so many Americans are willing to give up on this nation so easily just to be able to say they helped to elect the first black man to become President, then the rest of us (and them) may as well be very clear about what this man, Barack Obama, is offering in return and at what cost for everybody.
OBAMA, MICHELLE, AND THE DEMS' SOCIALIST AGENDA FOR AMERICA IS NOW REVEALED, BUT THE LIBERAL AND CONSERVATIVE PUNDITS ARE NOT HELPING AMERICANS TO STOP IT!
Instead, they have continued to either scoff, mock, taunt, ignore, or tear into the people who have sounded warnings against Obama's proposed changes even as he changes his mind faster than a first-time mother changes her newborn baby's dirty diapers (same thing).
Obama's recurring, bold statement that it remains his intent to "raise the economy from the bottom up," is paraphrased from the socialist ideology touted by the late Malcolm X, a black Nation of Islam leader during the same period as Minister Louis Farrakhan, a long-time Chicago associate of Barack Obama before he both renounced and denounced him, but only after Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) pressed him to do so during a Presidential debate.
What Obama fails to tell his listeners about his "bottom up plan" is that, at the time, Malcolm X was referring to poor blacks who were pressed at the bottom of society. But, Obama has clearly demonstrated that what he thinks and says depends on public sentiments at the time. And, overtime, he and his wife, Michelle, have amassed volunteers to help them to take the lead and rush all of us headlong into being a Socialist nation and to the point of no return.
Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK), Republican Vice-Presidential nominee and United States Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-MN) are correct in their public pronouncements that Obama is anti-American and anti-capitalist and that he intends to take this nation into Socialism.
Those two political leaders are numbered among too few who are in a position to do something about this downturn, and they are committed to staying with the facts and the truth, if they have to stand alone, because they know they are speaking truth.
Therefore, Obama's staffers have targeted opponents and even people from among their own party. And they have tried to denigrate their personal character and service records in an attempt to discourage them and anybody who supports them. Yet, too many American citizens still remain conflicted about how best they might use the power of their vote.
How many straight talkers will the Obama faction continue to try to silence through their denials of their adverse actions towards them and by abruptly changing terminology in the midst of dialogue? How much time does it take for elected leaders, pastors of churches, and news reporters who know the truth to finally get it widely disseminated that Obama has already begun his planned mission to destroy American constitutional and Godly freedoms, liberty, and justice from our capitalist system?
A projected President Obama has promised to bring all the people together and to not divide them. But, conspiracy theorist charges or not, I believe there are individuals and organizations who are responsible for deliberately manipulating the stock markets and fomenting unrest among citizens in order to make them crave for a "change," by Obama.
The Wall Street Board game was invented by Nicholas Platt, in 1978, when he was 25 years old. During that time, he worked in the trust department of Newark, New Jersey's Midlantic Bank. Early on, Platt consulted with his friends at the brokerage firm of Paine-Weber to get help to smooth out some of the basic problems with the game. He was also in the graduate program in economics at Columbia University. (Source: "Playing the Market: It's All in the Game," by Lisbeth R. Bensley, New York Times, November 19, 1978.)
Wikipedia states the following as part of Obama's work history reported there and, as quoted below,
"United States Senator Barack Obama's first job after graduating from Columbia University was with the Business International Company (BCI). He held a position as a research associate in its financial services division, where he edited Financing Foreign Operations, a global reference service, and wrote for Business International Money Report, a weekly financial newsletter."
Based on that description as a part of Obama's work history alone, if he did that work, no matter how briefly, then he should have been able to make a difference in both the economic and security problems experienced by this country. And, if he could have, then he should have done it by now. But, if not, then we know he has many partners across the globe who are known to speak ill of this country. And many of them have let it be known, also, that they stand ready and willing to help him to bring America down so that they can, themselves, rise up without fear of American power and Godly moral authority throughout the world.
Even now, the Obama-Chicago machine is running ripshod over the public, media, Senators and Congress with impunity and without accountability, by insisting on setting their own grassroot rules and laws to govern their actions in a lawful society. They know they would never be able to get elected, if they told prospective constituents "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" about their true purpose for seeking any elected office.
What's more, during this Presidential campaign, Obama and his wife, Michelle, are acting like little children unchaparoned at a birthday party or little children wandering around in a candy store with one penny in their little greedy hands -- all just at the thought of Obama possibly coming into what they deem to be having all the power (but only in their minds). What a mistake it would be, if Americans allowed the DEMS to get into the White House, because they either wasted their vote or else because of their silent objections, which would amount to consent.
At any rate, between Joe Biden, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and the whole gang, Obama might be hard pressed to even get near the Oval Office door anyhow!
THE OBAMA PROPAGANDA IS DESIGNED TO DIVIDE AND CONQUER AMERICA
In May 2008, the Obama campaign announced they had appointed Linda Douglass as their new senior strategist and media spokeswoman. She reportedly is an award-winning journalist of 35 years working for CBS and ABC. Most of her professional work has been done in and around Los Angeles, California, and Washington, D.C., where she is said to now reside with her husband, John R. Phillips, a lawyer, and a big fundraiser for Obama.
Despite the appearance of a conflict of interest to work for Obama, Douglass said her decision to leave her radio hosting job at the National Journal on the Air for more money to sign on to the Obama campaign came about because she and Obama happened to meet briefly and she was so impressed with Obama's candidacy message that she helped him to prepare for his debate in 2007. And, yet, why is that campaign just bringing her out in public this close to election?
Howard Kurtz reports that Douglass admits she met Obama in 2005, when she was covering the Senate. Kurtz also wrote that, "she believes in Obama's message," and quoted Douglass as saying, "for me this is really liberating." (Source: "The Reporter Who Speaks for Obama," By Howard Kurtz, Washington Post, June 16, 2008.)
Nevertheless, what Linda Douglass is quoted telling her previous employer is even more telling about her political views, as follows:
"She [Douglass] informed National Journal President Suzanne Clark this morning of her impending departure. 'I see this as a moment of transformational change in the country and I have spent my lifetime sitting on the sidelines watching people attempt to make change. I just decided that I can't sit on the sidelines anymore.'"
(Source: Media Research, May 22, 2008, Vol. 13, No. 97.)
Douglass has covered both the Obama-Biden and the McCain-Palin Presidential campaigns and the Washington Post also quotes her as saying, "I consider (McCain) still to be a friend. But I have fundamental differences with (him) on the issues and always have." And she admitted to having "Democratic-leaning views." (Source: Washington Post, by Howard Kurtz, June 16, 2008.)
Keep in mind what Linda Douglass has said above.
Remember, also, what Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) said, when he suddenly announced to a room filled with their Democratic fundraisers, "If Obama is elected, there will be people waiting to test his [Obama's] mettle."
At another rally, Biden told attendees and everybody else listening at home and abroad that President Bush was in agreement with Obama and that he was presently planning a timeline for the return of all U.S. troops from out of Iraq (and then Biden named a time for this reported pullout). But Biden should never have publicly disclosed such a plan, even if it happened. Yet, he claims to be experienced in foreign affairs? Only a braggadocious, insecure, inexperienced person would have publicly revealed government information that should have remained private. But he seemed not to care about whether or not it would have helped to put our troops in further harms way, especially at a time of war.
LINDA DOUGLASS AND LINDA JENNESS AND OBAMA'S SOCIALIST AGENDA
What I find most interesting about Obama's choice of Linda Douglass as his media spokesperson to espouse his all-too-secret Socialist agenda is that she puts me in mind of Linda Jenness, who became known from the early civil rights days of the 1960s as a staunch activist in the Socialist Workers Party (SWP). And, apart from the fact that they are both blonds and appear to have lived different lifestyles, I can see similarities in them.
To my knowledge Linda Jenness is still alive, but I haven't been able to pinpoint exactly where she lives because, like Obama, Jenness has lived in so many different places and has used various names.
In 1972, Linda Jenness was married to one Doug Jenness, who was, and still is, Editor of the Socialist Workers Party's magazine called, The Militant. And the Socialist agenda still remains as their ongoing intent, to change our government by "altering the form of government by changing the Constitution" rather than by violent overthrow, as was the case in the early years of the civil rights movement.
In a 1972 interview during another election, Linda Jenness remarked, "The Socialists do not fool themselves that they have a chance of winning any major victories this year. But I do believe I will live long enough to see a Socialist government in this country." (Source: "A Female Trotskyite Nominee Stumping In Texas," by Martin Waldron, New York Times, January 2, 1972.)
Linda's husband, Doug Jenness, had previously been married to, and divorced from, Caroline Lund of Minnesota. But, beginning in 1964, Lund became a long-time activist and staff member in the Socialist Workers Party. And, in 1965, Lund and her husband, Doug Jenness, moved to New York where Lund met and married fellow Socialist, Barry Sheppard. They married and stayed together until Lund died at age 62. (Source: "Obituary for Caroline Lund," By Michael Schrieber, November issue of Socialist Newspaper.)
In 1972, Linda Jenness became known as the first Socialist woman (31 years old at the time) who was nominated by her party for the Office of President. Her Vice President during that election was a black man named Andrew Pulley (20 years old at the time). Their intent was to challenge the constitutional age qualification for Presidential candidates. Her case was appealed to the Supreme Court and remains one of the most quoted cases on appeals of like cases. They lost their bid to the Executive Office.
What has to be made clear is that the Obama movement today is not a new movement. In 1972, Linda Jenness disclosed that their method of gaining public attention for their campaign was as she said,
"We'd tell organizations that if we weren't invited to their political rallies, we would picket them and get all their publicity."
Most of us have come to know that is one method of confrontation and intimidation which runs rampant and true to form within the Obama campaign. It is ruinous to the democratic form of government and must not be allowed to continue to advance in this country by any individual or organization, when it is done to deliberately interrupt an orderly process without regard for the law or circumstances.
Those tactics demonstrate to me that the late J. Edgar Hoover, Head, FBI, and many of the Congressional Subcommittees on Un-American Activities had it right in that there was a need to use methods of surveillance of subversive activities a long time ago.
America needs to keep praying for God to give us new, Godly leadership who will work together to turn back all of those anarchists, seditionists, and traitors who have taken over to corrupt this nation. And they need to be held accountable for the way in which our government has neglected its duty especially over the past two years under the Democratic rule of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and all of their committee chairpersons who had no compunction about allowing this nation to descend into the depths of despair and to the point of oblivion.
So full of outright hatred were the DEMS for President George W. Bush and Republican values, that they chose to destroy every vestige of what is right with America rather than to work with the President and Congress in a bipartisan way for the sake of all Americans.
Today, we are witnessing Obama's continuation of an ongoing democratic, planned attack against capitalism and God across this nation, which began to take shape with the Saul Alinsky methodology espoused by him in 1936. That action became a stepping stone towards smoothing out a pathway which would lead to communists and socialists acquiring political clout and power in America through a false representation of respectability now being displayed by former Socialist activists and coalition members in order to make inroads into positions of policymaking and economic voting power in this nation and throughout the world.
As in 1961, it remains true today that Socialists "seek to alter the form of government of the United States by unconstitutional means."
Moreover, today, the Democrat Party's plank remains almost as it did in 1972, and it included among other things, the following:
- A call for withdrawal of all U.S. troops and arms from Indochina [now it is a call for withdrawal from Iraq, Afghanistan, and from all around the world]
- Abolition of the draft [now it is a call for Reinstatement of the draft]
- Dismantling of all U.S. Bases around the world
- Support for the struggles of the Asian, Latin American, African and Arab peoples for national independence and social liberation. [Now that support includes Obama's proposed $150B Global Poverty Act for African relief]
- A campaign of struggle on all fronts against wage controls, inflation and unemployment
- The (Socialist) party advocated an end to all taxes on incomes below $10,000 a year and a 100 per cent tax on all incomes above $25,000 a year.
- The plank voiced support for the democratic right of black people to control their own communities [now calls for reparations and land for a separate state within the U.S. for blacks and people of color]
- Chicano liberation
- An end to the oppression of women
- Advocated support for youth, prisoners, and homosexuals
- Advocated expropriation of major corporations and banks, which would then be controlled by workers committees [now our nation is close to the Socialist goal of destruction of all forms of United States capitalism and the constitution]
The 1972 Socialist Party plank ended with the following recommendation for their future goals, which remain true for them in 2008,
"Bring to power a workers' government, with full recognition of the right of self-determination to the oppressed nationalities, to reorganize America on a Socialist basis." (Source: "The Socialist Workers Party: Trotsky's Legacy in the U.S.", By Lawrence Van Gelder, New York Times, March 19, 1975.)
And after all is said and done, if there remains any doubt in anybody's mind about Barack Obama and the DEMS' plank to finally and fully turn America into a Socialist nation, then tell me which part of that 1972 plank quoted above does not apply to Obama's presently stated and written goals for America in the 21st Century?
Has Obama not continued to demonstrate and to admit, when asked, that he is a staunch disciple of the Saul Alinsky school of community organizers? Is not the late Saul Alinsky, until this day, recognized as being the father of community organizers and that he was an avowed Socialist until his death? How many times have Barack Obama and his spokespersons of every ilk been caught in lies and insisted they had been truthful when so many people had produced substantial evidence that they weren't?
We who know and love America must step up to the return of respect, dignity, honor, truth, justice, and Godly pursuits of all that our forefathers began, because America is deserving of a loving and giving people worthy of living within her shores. And, if that goal is thought by some as being "racism," then so be it! But we shall all know who the real racists are.