By Rev. Lainie Dowell
My response to a comment left in re subject article.
Comment Located at: Canada Free Press
Posted by: B P Email: (withheld by VOICE INK)
1) "God is not the author of confusion... sun go down on your wrath" Were you referencing the recent anger and confusion at the McCain/Palin rallies?
2)Haven't both senators neglected their current duties to run for the presidency?
3)Which president was elected without "Millions of people and organizations" behind him? The trick to democracy is to have more "millions" than your opponent.
4)"The bottom up" is not an Obama original. I think it can be translated "We the people..."
5)"community organizers... and people taking to the streets..." are perfect examples of democracy at it's best. The alternatives are what? Dictatorship? Oligarchy? America was founded by community organizers and people taking to the streets. What exactly are you saying here? That instead of being ruled by the "millions", America should be ruled by a select few? I think your elitism is showing in your arguments, whether intended or not.
VOICE INK RESPONSE
I appreciate your comments and the opportunity to dialogue. Calling a matter by a term that may sound ominous such as "elitist" does not make it so. As with the law, when rightly applied, the outcome has to line up with the facts and the law to get to the truth. Obama's problem is his utter refusal to tell the truth and he knows there is so much evidence on hand to substantiate that. He has a deep-seated problem with truth. He has a character problem. And it would behoove the American people who see it to block and stop his bid for the Presidency.
And, that has nothing to do with race, as his campaign makes it to get the sympathy vote as a supposed victim
of racism.
The current "anger and confusion" you cited is not the same way I see it. It is borne out of frustration that people are feeling, because they are not understanding why Obama is being allowed to do and say everything that is anathema to what this nation stands for and the news media has not called him on it. And, now, they feel that McCain has been pressured by the Obama campaign turning every "No" into a racial hit rather than a matter pertaining to issues.
Obama, for months, has falsely lambasted the Republican Party from the President on down the line to McCain, with impunity. But nobody has called Obama on it. And yet he complains and whines about every attempt of Americans to get him to respond to the disparate remarks he has written and stated about himself. If he wants to be in a high-profile position, he needs to expect he will be placed under the microscope.
The difference in the current election environment introduced by the candidacy of Clinton (1992), Gore (2000), Kerry (2004), and Obama (2008) is how the anger emanated from their campaigns towards their Republican colleagues in an attempt to deflect the nation's attention from the issues to the personal.
What should concern Americans most is how this scenario is running true to form with the Democratic plans/agenda established as far back as the 1970s, which is documented through newspaper interviews that can be read within context of the times and without spin or bias, as is prevalent in many news reports today. There is a difference between fomenting anger in your target and then blaming your target for responding in kind -- and then having the fomenter acting as if they didn't know what or why?
Americans are being deceived by the Obama campaign and the DEMS, in particular. If Obama's change is for the benefit of all Americans, then well and good. However, Obama's purpose is self-centered on his behalf and that of the Democrat Party alone, and he should make that clear to the entire nation that is his purpose, but he is not doing that.
Americans deserve to know they are all working towards the entire overhaul of the constitution by consensus rather than by legitimate means laid out in the founding and amended document. What they are doing is operating under the surface to overthrow the government. That is a criminal offense (Federal) and they know it and that is why they talk fast and loose with the truth, when questioned.
The Office of President has to have someone who is trustworthy and can be trusted with top-level state secrets and plans to protect the nation and preserve it whole, if not better -- but never worse. The best decisions are made when all the facts are laid on the table and in context rather than eked out by bits and pieces and, then, scattered in all directions.
American people reject dictatorships and understand we must remain vigilant against having it occur in this nation.
Puttin, Chavaz, Castro brothers, and Raila Odinga are a few examples of how quickly unscrupulous elected leaders can snatch freedom from a free people -- and there is too much documentation to confirm that Obama is a traitor and a propagandist who is trying to operate under the radar of detection. Too late! He's caught! Please research his record and the past that he refuses to reveal. We have.
Again, I welcome your thoughts and am grateful you took the time to write. Feel free! I am, because God is.
Rev. L. Dowell, Five-Fold Minister
Read: "Minding Obama's Business" here. See Bea's other comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment